Bokep
https://viralbokep.com/viral+bokep+terbaru+2021&FORM=R5FD6Aug 11, 2021 · Bokep Indo Skandal Baru 2021 Lagi Viral - Nonton Bokep hanya Itubokep.shop Bokep Indo Skandal Baru 2021 Lagi Viral, Situs nonton film bokep terbaru dan terlengkap 2020 Bokep ABG Indonesia Bokep Viral 2020, Nonton Video Bokep, Film Bokep, Video Bokep Terbaru, Video Bokep Indo, Video Bokep Barat, Video Bokep Jepang, Video Bokep, Streaming Video …
- Most text in Wikipedia, excluding quotations, has been released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)1234. This means that the text can be reused only if you release any derived work under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License or the GFDL1. People who write content on Wikipedia do not have to give up their copyright to the material they contribute, but they must license their changes under the copyleft licenses Wikipedia uses4.Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.Most text in Wikipedia, excluding quotations, has been released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) and can therefore be reused only if you release any derived work under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License or the GFDL.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/CopyrightMost of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CopyrightsWikipedia's text content, in a nutshell, can be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license (CC-BY-SA); unless otherwise indicated, it can also be used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reusing_Wikipedia…People who write content on Wikipedia do not have to give up their copyright to the material they contribute. However, they must license their changes under the copyleft licenses Wikipedia uses, which are the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copying_within…
copyleft - In which cases must I relicense my product …
Jun 1, 2019 · If the answer is that I must make my whole production under the same license because it's a copyleft issue (like the GPL, that spreads), I can …
- Reviews: 1
cc by sa - Questions about CC BY-SA 3.0 text adaptaion and …
Aug 4, 2021 · I am plan to use big non-modified parts of text from Wikipedia under CC BY-SA 3.0 in new text material also licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0: just copy paste it into new material.
- Reviews: 2
creative commons - Can Wikipedia content be used on my …
Oct 18, 2015 · Wikipedias text is under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license (CC BY-SA 3.0). If you abide by those conditions - that is, credit the writers, and publish the …
- Question & Answer
creative commons - In a Wikipedia article am I able to insert ...
While writing an article on Wikipedia I needed to include text that is licensed under a CC-BY license. After a bit of digging I found that Wikipedia uses a CC BY-SA license. Question: …
How do Wikipedia licenses, CC-BY-SA and GFDL differ?
Mar 29, 2019 · Wikipedia licenses most of their text and images under two licenses, CC-BY-SA and GFDL. We can choose either of the licenses while using the work. I know both of them are …
creative commons - Extent of adapted material "contagion" in …
Jun 27, 2024 · I have a dataset and website which is partially derived from Wikipedia text. This seems to be licenced CC BY-SA. (This is merged with other free data: OGL, ODbL, etc).
- People also ask
GFDL and CC BY-SA compatibility and Use - Open Source Stack …
It's quite explicit that the only permissible license for a derivative work of a GFDL document is the GFDL. Section 11 (relicensing) doesn't change anything: it's essentially the "Wikipedia clause", …
cc by sa - Content mix under CC BY 2.0 and CC BY-SA 3.0.
I have a plan to use on my page content mix under different license sources: text materials from Wikipedia under CC BY-SA 3.0, and some images from Flickr under CC BY 2.0 and most part …
gpl - CC-BY-SA 3.0 and (A)GPLv3 - Open Source Stack Exchange
May 12, 2021 · All the text on Wikipedia is under CC-BY-SA 3.0. I understand that I can use the data provided that I release any derivative work under the same (or compatible) license. I now …
license compatibility - Is BioDigital's usage of inline Wikipedia ...
Apr 22, 2016 · In its anatomy browser BioDigital has a feature where the website displays text that it doesn't license under CC BY-SA. At the end of that text the user can click on "Read more". If …
cc by sa - Using code from Wikipedia - Open Source Stack …
Jul 13, 2018 · I found an algorithm and the corresponding implementation (code) on Wikipedia. Can I use that code in commercial software? Or would this mean that I would introduce a viral …
Proper use of Wikipedia code sample in open source projects
May 3, 2019 · You're planning on implementing the Wikipedia-provided pseudocode in other languages, which means you're creating a derivative work (or, as CC refers to it, Adapted …
Newest 'cc-by-sa' Questions - Open Source Stack Exchange
I have a plan to use on my page content mix under different license sources: text materials from Wikipedia under CC BY-SA 3.0, and some images from Flickr under CC BY 2.0 and most part …
Licensing a segmentation dictionary derived from CC SA-BY …
Dec 10, 2018 · The CC-BY-SA 4.0 does consider Similar Rights incl. database rights, but you cannot directly use Wikipedia content under CC 4.0. My interpretation: If your applicable …
cc by sa - Why didn't Creative Commons make CC-BY-SA 4.0 …
According to Wikipedia's official copyright FAQ: According to the WMF legal team, CC BY-SA 4.0 is not backwards compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0. Therefore, mixing text licenses under 3.0 and …
Can I use GPL v3 for source code and CC BY-SA v3 for comments?
Dec 26, 2015 · The CC-BY-SA 4.0 specifies that the work can be combined into a GPL 3 work and then the combined work can remain exclusively under the GPL. This doesn't work the …
Creative Commons ShareAlike, weak or strong copyleft?
Sep 13, 2019 · Yes, you can link CC-SA content along with your code. Weak/strong copyleft is a term that only exists for software, because it only defines an exception to the copyleft. To use …
How to give attribution for an adaptation in CC-BY-SA context?
Wiktionary uses version 3.0 of the CC-BY-SA license, which requires any reuser to attribute the "Original Author." The Original Author is defined as follows:
Can I use together React SPA under GPLv3 with materials from …
May 11, 2021 · I want to use parts of text materials from Wikipedia articles with link to the source like a page content. Can I do these without additional actions and which type of license for text …
commercial - Company policy says no code under license …
You are broadly correct that if your program includes CC BY-SA code from someone else, you must license the entire program under CC BY-SA.
Skip to content