Bokep
- Not a credible sourceWikipedia is a good place to start your research, but it is not a credible source that you should use to cite from1. Although many of the entries are well-documented and checked for quality, the online encyclopedia is not 100% reliable, because information can be manipulated, and sometimes almost undetectably2. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect3. To ensure accuracy, Wikipedia relies on several measures, including encouraging users to cite reliable sources, employing volunteer editors to monitor content, and encouraging community feedback to identify and rectify inaccuracies4.Learn more:✕This summary was generated using AI based on multiple online sources. To view the original source information, use the "Learn more" links.
Although Wikipedia is a good place to start your research, it is not a credible source that you should use to cite from. Wikipedia allows multiple users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked before publishing them.
paperpile.com/g/wikipedia-credible-source/So is Wikipedia a credible source? Many of the entries are well-documented, checked for quality and — as opposed to reference books — often completely up-to-date, but, 20 years after its creation, the online encyclopedia is not 100% reliable, because information can be manipulated, and sometimes almost undetectably.www.dw.com/en/fact-check-as-wikipedia-turns-20-…Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a…To ensure accuracy, Wikipedia relies on several measures. It encourages users to cite reliable sources, employs volunteer editors to monitor content, and encourages community feedback to identify and rectify inaccuracies.www.netreputation.com/the-truth-about-wikipedia-c… What’s Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources
Wikipedia - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
6 days ago · In general, most Wikipedia entries cover both positives and negatives and link to mostly credible sources of information to support their claims. Since bias varies from entry to entry and line to line, we rate them …
Wikipedia:Credibility - Wikipedia
Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia
Wikipedia – Be Credible - University of Kansas
Learn about Wikipedia's origins, operations, and controversies in this chapter from an open textbook on academic integrity. Find out how to use Wikipedia as an exploratory, tertiary source, and how to become an editor.
- People also ask
Is Wikipedia a Credible Source? What You Need to Know
In search of a source of truth – how reliable is Wikipedia?
Wikipedia's 20, but how credible is it? – DW – 01/14/2021 - dw.com
Is Wikipedia a good source? When to use the online …
Mar 20, 2023 · The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat one another with respect.
Wikipedia: The Most Reliable Source on the Internet?
Jun 3, 2021 · In my book I argue that the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created. Think about it—a peer-reviewed journal article is reviewed by three...
Credibility - Wikipedia
Why Wikipedia Isn’t as Credible as You Might Think - MUO
Wikipedia Credibility: Truthfulness & Reliability in Question
Can we trust Wikipedia? 1.4 billion people can't be wrong
Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia
How Accurate Is Wikipedia? - Live Science
FactCheck: Is Wikipedia a reliable source? – Channel 4 News - All 4
Wikipedia:How to increase Wikipedia's credibility - Wikipedia
The Truth About Wikipedia’s Credibility - NetReputation